• Home
  • Advertising
  • Bing Products and SEO
  • Building Presence on Social Networks
  • Google Products
  • Online Marketing
  • Random Stuff
  • Search Engine Optimization
  • Web Development
  • Website Design

PageRank and the No-Follow Tag

Google Products May 15, 2008
PageRank and the No-Follow Tag

How to Manage Your PageRank Flow Using the Nofollow Tag

The official Google blog announced recognition of the”nofollow tag” in January 2005. This tag did not gain widespread awareness until Matt Cutts, Google’s spokesperson to the SEO world, further clarified its many uses in his blog.

This post explains an excellent alternative use for the “nofollow” tag — helping to divert “link juice” to the most important pages and giving stronger link flow to improve your SEO results. What is the “nofollow” tag? The nofollow tag tells Google spiders not to pass the popularity value of a second-generation internal or external link to the page being linked.

This is best applied to specific internal pages, outbound links, paid links, or pages with duplicated content. The “nofollow tag” is not to be confused with the “noindex” tag, which prevents a page from being indexed by search engines.

An Alternative Use of the “Nofollow” Tag.

Matt Cutts and Rand Fishkin (SEOMOZ) summarized what Cutts conveyed when asked if using the “nofollow” tag was a good tool for preventing wasted PageRank. “Yes – webmasters can feel free to use nofollow internally to help tell Googlebot which pages they want to receive link juice from other pages.”

If you think of your website as a grapevine growing, and your PageRank as the available nutrients, you can do what grape growers do –prune the dominant vines in order for the already thriving clusters to flourish.

Once you have established what vines (pages) are producing the most fruit (SERP listings, traffic, conversions), use the “nofollow” tag to prune any pages that are not necessary for keyword searches.

You can also use a “nofollow” tag to divert less relevant pages that may be competing with each other. Some of the most common pages that are useful for your visitors and search engine trust factors, but not necessarily for appearing in qualified searches, may include your Privacy Policy, Terms of Service, Links page, Login pages, and others.

Suppose you are linking to these pages from your homepage.

In that case, you may be leaking some value that would be better directed to service description areas, a blog, how-to articles, and other valuable, content-rich pages. Although I have known about the tag for a while, I plan on using it a lot more in the next few months as I do my best to improve the link flow for our client websites.

For many of our marketing clients, we have used the most powerful SEO techniques. Now is the time when all the little things count.

Can you think of any other standard pages that might be a candidate for the “nofollow” tag?

Share This Post
Facebook Twitter Linkedin Google+
Newer Older

Comments (3)

  1. James

    22 May 2008 - 6:12 am

    Nice article. I especially like the way you describe using the “no follow” tag like grape growers prune their vines. That clicked for me. My question is… What does the “no follow” tag look like in context of a html link? In other words, where do you place it in a regular static link html?

  2. Anonymous

    22 May 2008 - 11:51 am

    James,Blogger does not allow me to post HTML tags.

  3. Green Nation Gardens

    19 Oct 2008 - 1:12 pm

    I have always been a johnny come lately. Always following trends long after they have come and gone. This is one trend that will not expire. I’m on it!!!

Comments are closed.

Archives

  • May 2025 (1)
  • April 2025 (5)
  • March 2025 (1)
  • November 2024 (1)
  • June 2023 (1)
  • August 2021 (1)
  • April 2021 (1)
  • March 2021 (3)
  • February 2021 (1)
  • April 2020 (1)
  • November 2019 (1)
  • May 2019 (6)
  • September 2018 (1)
  • May 2018 (1)
  • April 2018 (1)
  • November 2016 (1)
  • August 2016 (1)
  • April 2016 (1)
  • November 2015 (1)
  • October 2015 (1)
  • September 2015 (2)
  • February 2014 (1)
  • October 2013 (2)
  • September 2013 (1)
  • August 2013 (1)
  • June 2013 (2)
  • May 2013 (1)
  • February 2013 (2)
  • September 2012 (2)
  • August 2012 (3)
  • May 2012 (2)
  • November 2011 (1)
  • August 2011 (1)
  • July 2011 (1)
  • June 2011 (1)
  • May 2011 (3)
  • March 2011 (1)
  • December 2010 (2)
  • August 2010 (3)
  • July 2010 (2)
  • October 2009 (2)
  • July 2009 (1)
  • October 2008 (2)
  • August 2008 (3)
  • July 2008 (1)
  • May 2008 (2)
  • April 2008 (1)
  • January 2008 (1)
  • November 2007 (1)
  • September 2007 (1)
  • July 2007 (2)
  • June 2007 (3)
  • January 2007 (2)
  • December 2006 (3)
  • October 2006 (1)
  • September 2006 (2)
  • August 2006 (1)
  • July 2006 (2)
  • June 2006 (2)
  • May 2006 (2)
  • April 2006 (5)
  • March 2006 (2)
  • February 2006 (3)
  • January 2006 (3)
  • December 2005 (3)
  • November 2005 (7)
  • October 2005 (8)
  • September 2005 (5)
  • August 2005 (5)
  • July 2005 (1)
  • February 2005 (3)
  • January 2005 (1)